The Enigma of Freedom: Unpacking the Concept of Original Choice

In a world where choices are often seen as binary and predetermined, French philosopher Simone de Beauvoir presents a thought-provoking notion - that there is no choice so unfortunate that it cannot be saved. This idea challenges our conventional understanding of freedom, highlighting the complex and dynamic nature of human decision-making.

Beauvoir argues that we often mistakenly believe man has always a possible recourse to himself, as if he were solely responsible for his actions. However, this notion of self-reliance is misleading, as it overlooks the influence of internal factors that shape our choices. The concept of original choice is rooted in the idea that freedom is not a fixed state but rather an ongoing process, unfolding moment by moment throughout one's lifetime.

This drama of original choice is characterized by its arbitrariness, lacking any apparent reason or logic. It is as if we are operating solely on instinct, driven by whims and emotions without fully comprehending their consequences. Beauvoir illustrates this point by describing the child's development of character and universe, which is shaped by internal motivations and reflections.

The implications of this concept are profound, suggesting that our choices are not predetermined but rather the culmination of a lifelong process. We do not contain within us the person we will become; instead, we shape ourselves through a series of decisions that are both free and unforeseeable.

In conclusion, Beauvoir's notion of original choice challenges our understanding of freedom, highlighting its inherent uncertainty and complexity. By acknowledging this enigmatic nature of human decision-making, we can better grasp the dynamic interplay between internal and external factors that shape our choices.

What is the meaning of it